Mittwoch, 26. Oktober 2011

Auf Wiedersehen!

Dies ist mein letzter Post in meinem Blog 'Evolutionäre Spiritualität'. Gut zweieinhalb Jahre habe ich hier meine Gedanken zu Gott und Welt, Gut und Böse und Liebe und Tod veröffentlicht. Mit meinem letzten Post zu 'Love and Death' habe ich, glaube ich, einen guten Schlusspunkt gefunden. Wer meinem Blog ein wenig gefolgt ist, kann feststellen, dass sich meine Weltsicht seit Februar 2009 (Beginn meines Blogs) bis heute weiterentwickelt hat. Ich würde meine religiösen Überzeugungen z.Z. wie folgt zusammenfassen:
Am stärksten ist wohl der Agnostizismus und der atheistische Existenzialismus. Aber da ich in Bezug auf die letzten Fragen keine Gewissheit habe und gerne auch hoffen und glauben möchte, kann ich mir auch deistische oder theistische Gottesbilder vorstellen. Oder eine meiner Lieblingsvorstellungen: Pan(en)theismus. V.a. drei Sichtweisen scheinen mir persönlich besonders bedenkenswert:
  • Pan(en)theismus in seiner hinduistischen Form: Atman (die individuelle Seele) ist mit Brahman (der Weltseele) identisch. Die Existenz von Gut und Böse können so zur Grundlage eines lebenslangen Abenteuers werden. In einem atemberaubendem Abenteuer müssen wir lernen, das Beste in uns zu entwickeln.
  • Evolutionäre Spiritualität: In dieser Perspektive ist die Weltgeschichte und noch umfassender die Geschichte des Kosmos seit dem Big Bang von entscheidender Bedeutung. Im Verlauf der Weltgeschichte kann man einige Anhaltspunkte für das göttliche Versteckspiel finden. Die Welt ist nicht gut, aber sie wird besser. Darin liegt meine stärkste Hoffnung! Oder nehmen wir die noch grössere Perspektive der Kosmologie. Verdeutlichen wir uns, wie sich Raum und Zeit, Materie und Energie entwickelt haben und Galaxien und eben auch unser Sonnensystem mit unserem Planeten Erde hervorgebracht haben. Auf diesem Planeten hat sich das Leben durch die Kraft der Evolution entwickelt, vom einfachen Einzeller bis hin zu komplexesten Organismen, wie uns selbst. Was für ein unglaublicher Sieg für die Kräfte der Kooperation! Und schliesslich sind wir Menschen vor weit über 2000 Jahre in die Geschichte eingetreten, (d.h. seit wir Aufzeichnungen vom vergangenen Leben der Menschen haben). Jahrhundert für Jahrhundert ist der Kampf zwischen Gut und Böse weitergegangen. Aber gleichzeitig sind auch die Kreise der Liebe immer grösser und umfassender geworden: vom Stamm und Klan zur Nation, zu unserer jeweiligen Kultur und Religion, zur Menschheit, und schliesslich zum ganzen Ökosystem, dass alles Lebendige und Nicht-Lebendige umfasst.
  • Dualismus: Zuletzt die Perspektive meiner grössten Angst. Wenn die Kräfte des Bösen zu stark werden, tendiere ich zu einer dualistischen Weltsicht, wo Gut und Böse sich dann in einem kosmischen Kampf bekämpfen. Dann hoffe ich jeweils auf einen starken, weisen und erhabenen Gott, der dafür garantiert, dass schlussendlich, eschatologisch "alles gut gehen wird"...!
Die meiste Zeit beschäftigt mich eines dieser drei Weltbilder. Und entsprechend bin ich optimistischer oder pessimistischer. Aber immer habe ich das Gefühl, dass lachen die Angst besiegen kann.
  
Da ich seit Anfang letzten Jahres auch wieder Mitglied bei einer christlichen Gemeinschaft bin - bei den Reformierten - möchte ich hier noch drei Hauptkritikpunkte erwähnen. V.a. auch im Vergleich mit den amerikanischen Unitarian Universalists vermisse ich:
  • eine grössere Offenheit für andere Religionen,
  • einen innovativeren Drang die alte, biblische Tradition zu überdenken,
  • den Einbezug des Atheismus als mögliche, realistische Option.
Vielleicht komme ich auch irgendwann einmal wieder als Blogger zurück. Dann wird aber wahrscheinlich das Thema nicht mehr so lebenszentriert sein, wie bei der Evolutionären Spiritualität, sondern mehr existenziell, d.h. eine grössere Auseinandersetzung mit dem Thema: "Sterben und Tod" - eine existenzielle Spiritualität.
    
Schliesslich möchte ich mich noch bei allen meinen Lesern für ihr gezeigtes Interesse bedanken. Seit Anfang 2009 bis heute wurde mein Blog fast 10'000 mal aufgerufen (9276 Besuche) von fast 7'000 Besuchern (6688 Besucher) aus über 70 Ländern. Auf meiner Google Analytics Weltkarte sind fast alle Kontinente eingefärbt, d.h. es gab von dort Klicks auf meine Webseite. Nur aus Afrika und Zentralasien hatte ich kaum Besucher. Mit Abstand am beliebtesten war übrigens mein Post Gefallene Engel, Buddhismus und die Hölle!, vom 28.3.11. Er wurde 2030 mal aufgerufen. Auf Platz zwei ist Giving Up and Letting Go, vom 20.9.09 (420 mal aufgerufen). Und schliesslich Platz drei: Zwei Gedichte von Hermann Hesse, vom 22.5.09 (349 mal angeklickt).
  
Weiter plane ich diesen Blog auch als Buch bei Books on Demand herauszugeben. Wahrscheinlich wird das Buch ca. Anfang Dezember diesen Jahres fertig sein und kann dann im Webshop von BoD (BoD Shop) bis Ende 2012 gekauft werden. Hierzu wird es noch ein kurzes Update geben.
  
Das "letzte Wort" soll aber ein Videoclip haben:
  
The Riddle (das Rätsel), von Gigi D'Agostino.

Montag, 24. Oktober 2011

UU Theology IV - Love and Death

When a loved one dies, the greater the pain, the greater love's proof. Such grief is a sacrament. Sacraments bring us together. The measuer of our grief testifies to the power of our love. We can be crippled by grief, of course. There is such a thing as pathological suffering, which is any suffering that closes us off from others rather than connecting us to them. You can drown a soul with tears. This is not what I am talking about. I am talking about emtying ourselves that we may be filled, losing ourselves that we may be found, giving away our hearts even though they surely will be broken. But remembering that pain is a sign of healing. We cannot protect love from death. But by giving away our hearts, we can protect our lives from the death of love! It is in our lives and not in our words that our religion must be read. The irony is, by refusing to love we will have nothing left that is really worth protecting.
Martin Luther King lived in such a way that his life proved to be worth dying for. Especially when it came to love, he knew that the only things which are truly ours are those things we are prepared to give away.
We share the same fate. We are mysteriously given life, and for a brief time blessed with opportunities to love and serve and forgive one another as best we can.
Not to settle for who we are, but to stretch and become who we might be.
Death awakens me to life's preciousness and also its fragility. Many of the same guides who teach us how to live teach us also how to die. To live as if we are dying gives us a chance to experience some real presence. "Ok, dying tomorrow, what should I do today?"
It's a mystery. Who knows what happens after we die?
A proportional relationship exists between the fear of death and the fear of life. Until we can embrace death as (along with birth) one of the two essential thinges on which life turns, we remain, at least to a degree, in hiding. Doors locked and windows shuttered, we are unable to let in joy and fully experience love.
"I Love You Forever." The wisdom that love, and only love, never dies.
Simply put, everyone suffers. That is a given. Life is anything but fair. Not only does the rain fall but the sun also shines on both the just and the unjust. Just try to make sense of it. Yet all is not hopeless. Despite our ignorance and suffering, hope emerges in the lifelines that connect us. We cannot avoid adversity, loss or failure, but we do have a choice of how we will respond.
It takes courage to laugh, especially when the things we are struggling with are no laughing matter. The most healing aspect about the courage to laugh is that it keeps us from attaching addional strings to our troubles, no matter how seriously they are. Laughter - the mother of courage.
Rather than wondering why we don't have what she has and can't do what he does and can't be who they are, we take the opposite tack. We do what we can, want what we have, and embrace who we are.
Attending our own funerals: Did we take what God gave us and make the most of it? Did we overcame adversity when hard times came? Did we love our neighbor as ourselves? And did we make the world a more loving and interesting place? Could we be the grace that placed itself where lives were torn apart?
God leads me by the heart. When God dwells in my heart, I abide in God's presence.
We are not human because we think. We are humans because we care. All true meaning is shared meaning. The only thing that can never be taken from us is the love we give away.
Choose your enemies carefully, for you will become like them. Terrorism is powered by hatered. If we answer the hatred of others with hatred of our own, we and our enemies will soon be indistinguishable.
The Chinese ideogram for crisis juxtaposes two word-pictures: danger and opportunity. In Greek the word crisis means decision. In the weake of this tragedy, it is the decisions we make that will shape our character and (to a degree) drive the plot our lives will follow. The purpose of life is to live in such a way that our lives will prove worth dying for. Yet the same thing that makes us more attentive to death can also bring us to life. Love conquers fear because it cannot die. Eternity is not a length of time; it is depth in time. We enter and meet there through the sacrament of love. Ultimately, the courage to be requires the courage to let go. Fear accompanies us all the way to the grave, but we needn't hold its hand or accept its cold comfort. The word sacrifice literally means "to render sacred". Where does courage answer death? - God is love; and love casts out all fear.
For this dance of love and death, forgiveness provides the music.
Death is love's measure, not only because at a loved one's death our grief, however we express it, is equal to our love, but also because, when we ourselves die, the love we have given to others during our own brief span of days is the one thing death can't kill.
God is not God's name. God is our name for that which is greater than all and yet present in each. Call it what you will: spirit, ground of being, being itself; it remains what it always has, a mysterium tremens et fascinans, an awe-inspiring, mindbending mystery. Theology is poetry, not science. During our brief span, we interpret the greatest and most mysterious masterpiece of them all, the creation itself. The creation is our book of revelation. We rely on the oracle of our own experience, drawn from our reading of the book of nature and of human nature, including our reading of the Bible and our study of philosophy. The text of meaning is vast, its nuances many and various.
The Cathedral of the World: There are multiple windows, each telling its own story of who we are, where we came from, where we are going, each illuminating life's meaning. In this respect we are many. But we are also one, for the one Light shines through every window. No individual, however spiritually gifted, can see this Light - Truth or God, call it what you will - directly. We cannot look God in the eye any more than we can stare at the sun without going blind. This should counsel humility and mutual respect for those whose reflections on ultimate meaning differ form our own. Theologically speaking, we are certainly more alike in our ignorance than we differ in our knowledge.
The acknowledgment of essential unity of all religions is the central pillar of my faith. In contrast, religious fundamentalists, rightly perceiving the Light shining through their own window, conclude that theirs is the only window thourgh which it shines. They may even incite their followers to throw stones through other people's window. Secular materialists make precisely the opposite mistake. Preceiving the bewildering variety of windows and worshippers, they conclude there is no Light. Mutual respect is important. We do not and must not permit stone throwing in the cathedral.
Why then do we choose to join together rather than exercise our full freedom to believe what we will in the privacy of our homes? Simply because experience has taught us that we need one another. Whenever a trapdoor (of death) swings or the roof caves in, don't ask "Why?" Why will get you nowhere. The only question worth asking is "Where do we go from here?" And part of the answer must be "together". Together we walk, holding each another's hands, holding each another up. Together we do love's work and thereby we are saved.
To be at home with life we must make our peace with death. Theology's heartbeat is the miracle of our own existence. This miracle encompasses both birth and death. To this miracle, we must each do everything in our human power to awaken. We may not understand any better than before who we are or why we are here. But our life becomes a sacrament of praise. We will join the dance of life with more exuberance.
How people respond to their own death announcements: Shock. Disbelief. Anger. Bargaining. And then - finally, yet only perhaps - acceptance. We cannot embrace our life fully until we find a way to accept our death. Accepting things we cannot change frees the spirit to attend to matters within our control. Being an agnostic about the afterlife, I look for salvation here - not to be saved from life, but to be saved by life, in life, for life. Such salvation has three dimensions: integrity, or individual wholeness, comes when we make peace with ourselves; reconsiliation, or shared wholeness, comes when we make peace with our neighbors, especially with our loved ones; redemption, in the largest sense, comes when we make peace with life and death, with being itself, with God. All our lives end in the middle of the story. There is ongoing business left unfinished. We leave the stage before discovering how the story will turn out ...
Life may not be immortal, but love is immortal. Its every gesture signs the air with honor. Its witness carries past the grave from heart to heart.
If you are stuck, open a new chapter. Turn the page. Answers lock us in place. Questions lead us on adventures. Until life ends, no destination is final. Looking for new quesitions, not old answers. Begin small. Dream possible dreams. Set out to climb a single hill, not every mountain.
"What did I do to deserve this?" we ask when things turn against us, forgetting that we did nothing to deserve being placed in the way of trouble and joy in the first place. Mathematically, our death is a simple inevitability, whereas our life hinges on an almost infinite sequence of perfect accidents. There is an unbroken line genetically and kinetically to the instant of creation. Think about it. The universe was pregnant with us when it was born. Dust to dust. And in between, erupting into consciousness - into pain and hope and trust and fear and grief and love - the miracle of life! We are never closer than when we ponder the great mystery that beats at the heart of our shared being.
Little hints of eternity in time: Albert Schweitzer spoke of this principle as reverence for life. We are part of, not apart from, a vast and mysterious living system. Mystics of every faith proclaim this sense of oneness. Thus the Brahman-Atman relationship of Hinduism, the sense of nirvana of the Buddhists, and the concept of Jesus that "I and the Father are One." - Mystical oneness! The great religious seers have all recognized that beyond the intellectual realm lies a numinious oneness that transcends all differences, call it the Holy, the divine Spirit, God - it doesn't matter. Divine kinship as children of one great mystery, children of God, the mother, creator, consoler, and comforter.
Some reflections on reimagining God: Responding to life-and death questions, we have reinvented and thereby rediscovered the Holy throughout the centuries. Consider our ancestors, the searchers who came before us. Being with cave dwellers - hunters and gatherers - for whom the greatest imaginable powers were forces of nature. When agriculture replaced hunting and gathering, these deities became female. "God" became "Goddess"; pro-creation, creation; birth, life. Later, with the city-state, power came wrapped in the robes of authority. "God" was now Lord or King, protector, enforcer, and judge. A breakthrough in this view of the divine nature arrived with the Hebrews, who blieved that their God and King was the only God and King. Less an imperialistic than an ethical development, this lead them to attribute their failures not to another stronger God, but to their own shortcomings. With Jesus, God became Father (in fact, Daddy, or "Abba"), a far more intimate authority figure. When Copernicus displaced us from the center of the universe, in reimagining God one group of scientists and theologians seized upon a metaphor better suited to their new worldview. God became the Watchmaker, who created the world, set it ticking, and then withdrew to another corner of the cosmos. This is the God of the deists, a God icy and remote, still transcendent but no longer personal. And it seams that to our postmodern time a reflexive God might be an option worth thinking of. We become cocreators with God in an unfolding, intricate drama of hitherto unimaginable complexity. No longer merely actors on God's stage, by this reading of creation history, we are participants in the scripting of God's drama.
I've never needed biblical miricales to confirm my faith. It's not the supernatural, but the super in the natural, that I celebrate. Following the spirit, not the letter, of the Scriptures, my abiding touchstones are awe and humility.
The surest path to God (the Sacred or the Holy) is to follow not the logic of our minds but the logic of our hearts! We discover the Holy - its healing and saving power - by acting in harmony. Remember, God is simply our name for the highest power we know. If we define god as love, we discover God's nature in our personal experience of love. We are born into a great mystery. We die into a great mystery. In between, what we know of God we learn from love's lessons. Love teaches us the difference between what is holy and what is diabolical. When we act in concert with our higher selves and embrace our neighbors, we act in the presence of all that is divine. Conversely, the demonic divides us against our higher selves and from our neighbor. God is not all-knowing or all-powerful, but all-loving and all-merciful. When love dwells in our hearts, we dwell in God's presence. Does this answer the question "Why?". No. Final answers to ultimate questions lie far beyond the ken of human understanding. We keep asking, of course. It's the nature of our being, the nature of our quest. (Der Mensch, das rätselnde Wesen.)
No one knows whether heaven actually exists. All we can say with any confidence about the afterlife is that it cannot be any stranger or more unexpected than life before death! Plato speaks of "jewels of the soul" that we perceive "through a glass dimly" as the most valuable prizes on our human treasure hung. Saint Paul wrote, "Now we see through a glass darkly, then face to face." "Surely unto God all things come home," affirms the Koran. "God will be there and wait till we come." (Walt Whitman). "Be the lamps unto yourselves. Hold to the truth within yourselves as the only lamp." Buddha preached in his farewell sermon. And Socrates: "The difficulty, my friends, is not to avoid death, but to avoid evil; for it runs faster than death ..."
I certainly don't believe in hell. I am a Universalist. I am confident that when we die, we will all experience peace. The peace of extinction is different from the peace of fulfillment, of course. Yet, whether to fullfillment or extinction, when God carries us home it will be to a place of eternal rest. We come from God and return to God. "Having passed through the valley of the shadow of death, we will dwell in the house of the Lord forever."
Born sunny-side up, I wanted all my endings to be happy ones. That may, in part, explain my lifelong attempt to reclaim death as the most natural thing imaginable, a well-planted period or, in some rare instants, an exclamation mark placed at the end of our life story.
However sourrounded we may be by love, we each die alone. And who knows, part of the process of dying may encourage us to release oursleves form all our earthly bonds so that we may leave in greater peace. We may join our loved ones in heaven. Or we may return the constituent parts of our being to the earth from which it came and rest in eternal peace. About life after death, no one knows.
That said, will my love live on forever? I believe so. And your love, too. It will certainly live on after your death, continuing to touch from heart to heart long after you have gone...

We are the religious animal; knowing that we must die, we cannot help but question what life means. - The wonder that lies between the sacred moments of our birth and death.
  
Forrest Church. 2008. Love & Death - My Journey through the Valley of the Shadow. Beacon Press, Boston. Forrest Church was senior minister at All Souls Unitarian Universalist Church in New York City. He was educated at Standford and Harvard University. He wrote this book while knowing that he will soon die of terminal cancer.

Samstag, 22. Oktober 2011

The Opportunity State

The primary achievment of postwar social democracy (and to a lesser extent American liberalism) was the creation of the mixed economy and a strong welfare state to help harness the best aspects of capitalism and protect people from the worst aspects. The combination of sustained economic grwoth, full-employment policies, industrial planning and social provisions generated unprecedented prosperity, peace, and rising living standards for millions of people.
Bonds of work, religion, and class matter far less to people these days, and as we are seeing with the fierce immigration battles across our nations, the humanitarian and multicultural impulse underlying our progressivism is not easily extended to outsiders. The traditional working class base of support is both shrinking and increasingly being seduced by a new politics of identity driven by cultural insecurities rather than by economic arguments. 
These developments can be addressed but it will require a radically different notion of solidarity - one that helps people understand the collective eonomic need for breaking down barriers to individual achievement and the moral basis for helping others reach their highest potential academically, professionally, and culturally. This is a strong form of solidarity, but one that recognizes the importance of individual and localized lives. It is deeply progressive in its commitment to human dignity and equality, but it is less class bound and more open to people of different walks of life.
This new vision of solidarity must embrace rather than reject the progressive commitment to diversity and individual freedom that are mainstays of the worldview of younger generations. Solidarity, as reconceived for a new eara, will focus more on mutal responsibility and the need to foster individual achievement and community stability in an era of scarce resources and a rapidly shifting global economy.
Progressive forces will always focus on the mixed economy, social protections, and full employment policies. But we must do more to show the voters of our new coalition how progressive state action can enhance their individual life opportunities, high-wage, high-skilled economies, the transformation of infrastructure and cities, clean energy, a more modern tax and labour market system, new international leadership, and the creation of a global middle class and new export markets. In short, we need a vision of an opportunity state that combines traditional security measures with new efforts to support greater social mobility and reduce social inequality.
A new era of opportunity will require a much stronger state role in making our economies more competitive with other nations through long-term investments in education, energy infrastructure and transportation, and the creation of high-wage jobs. Individuals alone cannot contend with the forces shaping the global economy; and social democracy, among the array of progressive parties, are particularly well placed to argue for the importance of serious public investment and strategic planning.
This will also require sustained intellectual and policy attacs on the underpinings of conservative economics - the efficient markets hypothesis, deregulation, privatizatoin, and supply-side tax policy - that contribute so much to instability and inequality in the world economy today. Just to be clear, our suggested focus of the opportunity state is not designed to replace traditional social democratic policies or to push neoliberal theory, privatization, and deregulation. We are advocating a strong theory of the state with a new dimension.
It is our belief that we should show voters how the state can both protect people from the failures of markets (the welfare state) and provide a platform and set of tools for people to make the most of market opportunities and to help solve collective problems (the opportunity state).

The Demographic Change and Progressive Political Strategy Series, Center for American Progress
From Welfare State to Opportunity State, by Matt Browne, John Halpin, and Ruy Teixeira
Entrevista a Matt Browne, You Tube

Freud, Adler, Jung - Psychoanalyse und Tiefenpsychologie

Sigmund Freud:
Der Umstand, dass unbewusste Vorgänge nach Freud nur verfremdet oder nur zum Teil ins Bewusstsein kommen, liegt an einer Art innerer Barriere, die Freud "Zensor" nannte und die dafür sorgt, dass vieles, was uns unangenehm oder peinlich ist, sozusagen im Untergrund verweilt, vor allem sexuelle und aggressive Anteile, die durch verschiedene Abwehrmechanismen abgeblockt werden.
Allerdings kehrt das Verdrängte in verzerrter Form zurück, etwa als neurotisches Symptom einer Depression mit vielen Schuldgefühlen gegenüber allem und jedem, bis sich der zugrunde liegende Konflikt zumeist im Rahmen einer Psychoanalyse, erinnern, konstruktiver wiederholen und schliesslich durcharbeiten lässt.

Alfred Adler:
In einer individualpsychologischen Therapie geht es darum, angemessenere Wege zu suchen, um die grundsätzlich legitimen Wünsche befriedigen zu können, von anderen Personen akzeptiert und respektiert zu werden. Ein wichtiges Behandlungsziel ist, sich selbst mehr zu mögen und sich zu einem gesellschaftlichen und liebesfähigen Menschen zu entwickeln. So soll dem neurotischen "Willen zur Macht" zur Beherrschung des Gegenübers und zur Missachtung von Grenzen anderer Leute entgengewirkt werden.

Carl Gustav Jung:
Das oftmals ferne Ziel einer jungschen Analytischen Psychotherapie ist dann ein Mensch, der Licht und Schatten, Weibliches wie Männliches, Gefühle und Gedanken, Oberfläche und Tiefgang, Selbstbewusstsein und Gemeinschaftlichkeit, Bedürfnisse und Grenzen zu einem funktionierenden, sinnvollen Ganzen gemacht hat.

Adrian Urban, 2011. Psychotherapie für Dummies, WILEY-VCH Verlag, Weinheim, S. 129-142.

Freitag, 21. Oktober 2011

Declaration of Oneness

Declaration of Oneness (deutsche Version)


Ich verkünde:
  1. Dass die Botschaft „Wir sind alle eins“, miteinander in Beziehung, miteinander in Verbindung und voneinander abhängig, mit Gott / dem Leben / ein Mensch mit dem anderen, die eine spirituelle Botschaft ist, auf die die Welt gewartet hat – damit auf die gegenwärtigen Herausforderungen der Menschheit Antworten gefunden werden, die liebevoll und nachhaltig sind.
  2. Dass die Welt nicht so sein muss, wie sie momentan ist – und dass einzelne Menschen in der Lage sind, sie zu verändern, indem sie ihr Potenzial einsetzen, spirituelle Bürger zu sein.
  3. Dass die Menschheit grundlegend gut ist und unbegrenztes Potenzial aufweist, und dass soziale Transformation mit persönlicher Transformation beginnt. Ich erkenne daher die Wichtigkeit an, mich im Verlauf der Reise meines Lebens mit meiner göttlichen Essenz und inneren Weisheit zu verbinden. Hiermit erlaube ich den feinsten und höchsten Ebenen des menschlichen Potenzials zu gedeihen, was zum gemeinsamen Wohl aller ist.
  4. Meine Bestrebung, solchen Prinzipien Unterstützung zu gewähren, die dieser Deklaration zugrunde liegen: spirituelle Prinzipien, globale Ethik und universelle Werte wie Respekt, Gerechtigkeit, Friede, Menschenwürde, Freiheit, Verantwortungsbewusstsein und der Geist der Zusammenarbeit.
  5. Dass die Menschen einander brauchen, um auf diesem Planeten zu überleben. Ich erkenne an, dass wir alle hier zusammen gehören, und dass menschliche Gemeinschaft dadurch gedeiht, dass wir mehr übereinander herausfinden und die Wunder und die Schönheit unserer Vielfalt feiern. Ich verkünde, dass ich meinen Beitrag dazu leiste, dass eine Kultur entsteht, in der wir, die Völker der Welt, unsere gemeinsamen globalen Anliegen auf ganzheitliche, positive und transformierende Weise angehen, und in Frieden miteinander leben.
  6. Dass Einssein alles Leben umfasst – auch diejenigen Teile, die wir als „anders“ oder „die anderen“ ansehen. Ich erkenne an, dass Ganzheit und Zusammengehörigkeit nur durch die Erfahrung der Einzigartigkeit, Schönheit und Sinnhaftigkeit aller Aspekte des Lebens erlebt werden kann, und dass dieser Erkennungsprozess bei mir selbst beginnt.
  7. Dass ich Bestandteil eines neu entstehenden Bewusstseins bin, welches einen Geist der Offenheit, des Nachforschens, des Verbindens und der Beziehung mit mir selbst und dem gesamten Universum fördert, und welches kontinuierlich die Wunder, die Schönheit und das Mysterium von all dem wahrnimmt.
  8. Ich verkünde, dass die Zeit für den Wandel jetzt gekommen ist, und ich verkünde die Wichtigkeit der Deklaration eines Tages, der für die gesamte Menschheit vorgesehen wird, damit sie als eine menschliche Familie zusammen kommt, um das Einssein in Gesprächen zu erkunden, sich im Feiern daran zu erfreuen und es auf der Erfahrungsebene zu erleben.

Sign the Declaration

Humanity's Team

Montag, 17. Oktober 2011

Being and Becoming

"I like very much Evolutionary Spirituality. One of its leading thinkers is Andrew Cohen. He tries to integrate Eastern and Western religions and philosophies. He names his teaching Evolutionary Enlightenment. I don't like his meditation enlightenment teachings. But he has a good approach to being and becoming. Whereas classical mysticism is about being, about the ground of being, the eternal one, becoming is about the dynamics of evolution, of the process of development. It is becoming which brings the dynamic into our world. There is an energy, creativity and intelligence which has started the Big Bang. There is the process of life, of a living Universe which has lead to the creation of us humans and the other forms of life. After matter and energy and life, the emergence of mind is the third "big bang". Becoming ("the evolutionary impuls") appeals to me, because it leads to a sense of awe about the grandeur of the evolving Universe and about the marvel of living and sentient creatures.
Thus far some thoughts of mine on the problem of process theology and religious naturalism."
(One of my postings in a course on UU theology.)

    

***
O Great Mystery,
All-Creating Source of this strange wonder, life,
We and all the other creatures
   of this homeland Earth your children are.
When you were the first stars, we were there.
When you were the lifeless Earth, we were there.
Yes, we were there in the warm seas,
   learning how to be life.
Now that we are alive,
   and can think,
   and can speak,
You at last have a mind and a voice.
O Great Creating Mystery,
   We your children give you mind and voice;
   We your children are your heart and song.

William D. Hammond

Samstag, 8. Oktober 2011

UU Theology III - Nature

Ralph Waldo Emerson distinguishes some of the following strands in his famous essay "Nature" (1836):
- Delight in nature: "In the presence of nature, a wild delight runs through the man."
- Mysticism of nature: "Standing on bare ground ... I became a transparent eye-ball."
- An ethic of harmony with nature: "The greatest delight ... is the suggestion of an occult relation between man and the vegetable."
- Nature is useful to humans: "To "man", it serves as commodity, beauty, language, discipline."
- Questions about where nature actually exists: "What is ultimately real - nature or some other realm? The world is a devine dream from which we may presently awake ..."
- Transcendental aspect of nature: "It leads the mind to the higher power, God, and then disappears. These are the happiest moments in life."

This outline reveals the presence of an important dualism in Emerson's essay:
1.) the mysticism of nature versus
2.) the transcendental aspect of nature.
The first locates the divine in nature itself, the second ascribes a mediating function to nature in the sense that through nature, our minds attain what we actually seek - the God Who "stands" behind nature.

Green parties all over the world give priority to the "interconnectedness of all life on Earth." Its key values are (according to Charlene Spretnak): ecological wisdom, grassroots democracy, personal and social responsibility, nonviolence, decentralization, community-based economics, postpatriarchal values, respect for diversity, global responsibility, and future focus. Many greens practice some form of paganism, neo-paganism, shamanism, or goddess religion, and many worship the Earth as a spiritual being. Worship is thus an expression of awe at the intricate wonders of creation and celebration of the cosmic unfolding.
Spretnak's "sustainable religion" puts her at odds with humanistic commitments. She rejects what is human-centered in favor of the earth-centered. She explicitly denounces humanism because of its focus on the human. In her view, it is hubris to declare that humans are the central figures of life on Earth and that we are in control. In the long run, Nature is in control!

For me there is no insurmountable difference between human-centred humanism and earth-centered religions. For me the "circles of love" are allways growing larger and larger. First, your families and friends, then humanity, then nature and finally the cosmos as a whole - the cosmocentric world view. But you must not allways follow these steps. Focus on what is most important for you today. Or start with the cosmocentric world view, since this is the most encompassing and thus most important world view - the cosmic dimension of love!
            
While the world is real the mind has the capacity to change its conception of it, its relationship to it. If we can change the appearance of nature by changing our mental picture of it, is the world only as real as the image you carry of it in your mind? You decide ...!
 
Rig Veda 1.6.3 states: "Nature's beauty is an art of God. Let us feel the touch of God's invisible hands in everything beautiful. By the first touch of His hand rivers throb and ripple. When He smiles the sun
shines, the moon glimmers, the stars twinkle, the flowers bloom. By the first rays of the rising sun, the universe is stirred; the shining gold is sprinkled on the smiling buds of rose; the fragrant air is filled with sweet melodies of singing birds, the dawn is the dream of God's creative fancy."